Some scoops that I produce have numerous hyperlinks that I try to customize with the PRO features (to make my scoop look nicer). However, now that my curator insight is showing on the post when some else rescoops it, the links are not included (unless I paste in the URLs which would make my page look less profession, kind of defeating the purpose). What I propose is that when a Pro/Business user hyperlinks materials on their curator insight, that those links are visible when another scoop.it user rescoops the material since it is still a part of my insight that I'm adding to the scoop (whether the are pro users or not). Thank you for your consideration!

Hello.

I'm very enjoyed that lots f people have joined scoop.it, because scoop.it his MARVELOUS.

The contents are really very useful and very relevant, and your site works extraordinarily well. Without ever bugs (example: facilitated with whom(which) to pay(pour) my photo to send you my photo in my message of feed back; button of shortcut " scoop it " on my bar(helm) of Google Chrome tasks, to publish articles directly, and with an extreme facilitated, a very big working comfort, a big productivity).

But I thing that, whith all people I engage to join you (on TWITTER, FACEBOK, LINKED IN...), and essencially by sharing, I could have one month more free on scoop.it.

Because it's not finished.

And, if I decide to settle as objective to make people come on scoop.it, so that they subscribe, then I can send you many more new customers (it is not at present my priority. And I am always very busy).

I am very active on a great deal of social networks (approximately 30), and referenced on about 200...!!!

And I am a very good commercial, an a great influencer...!

Objectively, and HUMBLY...

Have a VERY nice sunday.

#NY

Best regards.

Philippe TREBAUL

@TREBAULPhilippe

33-6-42-97-88-47

My initial opinion of the new format is positive, but two concerns immediately present themselves. First, as has been previously mentioned, the switch to an "all italics" layout distresses me. Over the last year I have carefully used the presence and absence of italics in my scoops to distinguish the commentary I give to each item. If you look at virtually any page of the many hundreds of scoops I have carefully curated, you will see that each one includes italicized and non-italicized components to set off certain sections of my commentaries. Now, suddenly all of my judiciously placed italics have been obliterated. I would very much advocate to return to the format of allowing the curator to determine which sections are italicized.

Secondly, the new heading of "John Doe's insight:" is distressing to me for the following reason: for literally hundreds of scoops I have used a "Curator comment" format to share my observations about each scoop (I've almost never just scooped an item without giving commentary about why I think it is significant). My stomach dropped when I realized I may now have to use this automatic "insight" format. I think I understand that one purpose of this feature is to encourage curators to personalize their scoops and make them more relevant by sharing their opinions, but I wish you would at least let me choose the wording. I have tried to keep my name somewhat out of each scoop so that the material speaks for itself and so that my magazine maintains a somewhat "objective" tone (my target audience is both a niche of specialized professionals and the general public). But with this new format my name is now prominently displayed whether I want it or not. I would, at the least, encourage this feature to be optional. I would again ask you to look over some of my hundreds of scoops to see how I have developed an effective layout for my purposes and how significantly that is being altered by the the new format. I've worked assiduously to develop the overall "tone" of my site, and some much-valued autonomy in that regard has been removed from me by the above two changes.

Thank you for carefully considering my observations and opinions. I strongly support your mission and think it has already helped those in my field to have a centralized location for gathering information.