I think a Scoop would do more justice to the original source if you automatically added a link to the source. The way you do it when i send a Scoop to Wordpress. Especially when you give context, write an article, people won't immediately understand that the headline is the link. The you need an extra link. That's why Robin Good does that by hand. I would like it automatically, like with Wordpress integration.

And even better: instead of "See on online.wsj.com" (when used with Wordpress) i would only like underlined / clickable 'online.wsj.com' Why? Because i write in Dutch (and others will write in other languages). Then it's strange to have one sentence in English.

Hi -- I noticed that Scoop.it made a change awhile ago that when other curators re-scoop an article I've posted on my content, I get credit with a 'via'. If a reader clicks on the article, it used to go to my content and they could plainly see my review and know that I wrote it. Of course, it was then another extra step for the reader to click through to the original article.

However, I write reviews of each article I curate. When another curator re-scoops one of my articles + review, it comes across as if that person wrote the review. Hey, that's not right! I put work in to write these reviews and it is not fair when it looks like another curator wrote the review instead of me.

Does this also mean that I am not getting credit for click-through views from the readers. It would make sense if that was happening too.

Help! Help! What can be done? I know the change was made to make it easier for the reader, but the original curator is getting short shrift. I feel like I'm actually getting ripped off because other curators are note identifying who wrote the original review.

Suggestion: identify that the review is coming from the original curator. Otherwise I'm going to have to add a sentence to each review that I wrote it along with a link to my scoop.it. Yuck. That is really going to annoy my readers.

What say you? Looking forward to hearing your feedback.

Karen Dietz, Just Story It

I was looking for a way to aggregate several scoops in a issue just like for a daily or weekly paper (to tell the truth, just like paper.li).

Is there already a way to to that ?
Otherwise is there such a feature planned anytime ?

I think it would be nice to be able to create issues with my own scoops or we could even imagine several curators working together on one issue.

In my opinion the collaborative aspect could increase the traffic to scoop.it and even to the sites referenced in scoops.

I voluntarily put that feedback in the category "Community and Interactivity" although maybe it could as well be filled under "Sharing options".

Thank you for reading my feedback
Best Regards
Greetings

Adrien Sebbane

I like contributing links to other curators of topics. But, it is frustrating to have a huge, long list of them and not be sure (just from the title) if I am sending the link to the right one. I've taken masses of topics I followed off my list today and limited it strictly to topics I can contribute to and have already sent some links. Could we get the topics listed by a main keyword instead? This would make it much simpler to send the links they would really be interested in. Also, every topic could be listed for everyone - in subcategories for Arts, Computers, etc. - like a web directory set up.

STOP à la pression et à la répression permanente!
STOP à la dévotion!
STOP au bénévolat!

Nous, INFIRMIER(E)S et AIDE SOIGNANT(E)S toutes spécialités confondues, de tous les secteurs, dénonçons la pénibilité et la dégradation constante de nos conditions de travail, qui contribuent aujourd'hui à la mise en danger du patient, au risque accru d'erreur professionnelle et à la détérioration de notre état de santé.

Nous dénonçons un système qui fonctionne au détriment du patient et nous refusons aujourd'hui de contribuer à ce système.
Un système qui privilégie la rentabilité au détriment de la qualité et de la sécurité des soins et qui nous empêche aussi d'exercer dignement nos rôles de tuteurs auprès des étudiants infirmiers et aide soignants.

Nous exigeons la mise en place de postes supplémentaires adaptés à la réalité du terrain et en accord avec les différentes réglementations de la profession, des revalorisations salariales et d' honoraires ,une mise à plat de la nomenclature des actes infirmiers, la reconnaissance de nos années d'étude dans chaque spécialité, un vrai statut pour l'aide-soignante, la reprise en compte de la pénibilité, l'intégration de nos primes pour nos retraites.

Nous sommes déterminé'(e)s à nous faire entendre et à ce qu'une véritable réforme de notre statut et de nos conditions d'exercice soit mise en place, et pour ce faire, nous envisageons des actions ciblées et de grande envergure. Nous appelons tou(te)s les soignant(e)s à nous rejoindre et à relayer ce message dans leurs structures et leur entourage.

STOP aux services surchargés!
STOP à la surexploitation des soignants!
STOP à la mise en danger des patients!

NI BONNES NI NONNES NI PIGEONNES!

Rejoignez-nous sur: https://www.facebook.com/groups/NiBonnesNiNonnesNiPigeonnes/